We rely heavily on having the county in an address field. Much of our work comes from being able to segment by county. This is not an optional "nice idea"; it is a critical part of our work. PLEASE add this important feature!!
We serve 25 counties and it is an important part of our communication segmentation and reporting to be able to filter on this; it is also helpful to a variety of data maintenance tasks to know and filter on county. Because some cities partially sit in 2 or more counties, filtering by city for this purpose is not only excruciating, but could yield significantly inaccurate results for our underserved counties. To prepare for transition to Unified View, we've now gone years without a way to include this info in the address block and being unable to filter. Even if for some reason this is not automatically added through address features in RENXT, please include it as an optional field for addresses AND indexed for filtering in the address filter. There are several related ideas that haven't been merged into this one, so lots of people have been requesting it as a need. For people who sign up for email communications but don't want to include their address, they are often more willing to provide their county, so I think it would greatly improve retention of subscribers if this option was available to us.
Our gift officers are geographic, and our database is separated into eight different regions based on their county, one region for each gift officer. Please do NOT lose the region and county data fields.
We need the county code in unified view as our Fundraiser assignments are based on counties in several states. Regional fundraising reporting and alumni events are also based on counties.
These are already implemented, but county showing up in the address block relies on how the addresses for that country are formatted in DB view's international configurations.
We rely heavily on having the county in an address field. Much of our work comes from being able to segment by county. This is not an optional "nice idea"; it is a critical part of our work. PLEASE add this important feature!!
We serve 25 counties and it is an important part of our communication segmentation and reporting to be able to filter on this; it is also helpful to a variety of data maintenance tasks to know and filter on county. Because some cities partially sit in 2 or more counties, filtering by city for this purpose is not only excruciating, but could yield significantly inaccurate results for our underserved counties. To prepare for transition to Unified View, we've now gone years without a way to include this info in the address block and being unable to filter. Even if for some reason this is not automatically added through address features in RENXT, please include it as an optional field for addresses AND indexed for filtering in the address filter. There are several related ideas that haven't been merged into this one, so lots of people have been requesting it as a need. For people who sign up for email communications but don't want to include their address, they are often more willing to provide their county, so I think it would greatly improve retention of subscribers if this option was available to us.
Our gift officers are geographic, and our database is separated into eight different regions based on their county, one region for each gift officer. Please do NOT lose the region and county data fields.
We need the county code in unified view as our Fundraiser assignments are based on counties in several states. Regional fundraising reporting and alumni events are also based on counties.
This field really must be brought over to be visible on addresses in RENXT web view. It's a crucial part of our development team's outreach.
These are already implemented, but county showing up in the address block relies on how the addresses for that country are formatted in DB view's international configurations.
There are currently duplicated ideas for this. Blackbaud - please merge RENXT-I-4628 into the older idea RENXT-I-2788.