Pull RE field labels in RE NXT

Pull the renamed field labels from classic RE into RE NXT. If a field is repurposed or even hidden in RE classic, RE NXT does not follow.

  • William da Silva
  • Nov 12 2015
  • Will not implement
  • Attach files
  • Jillian Kramer commented
    14 Jul 15:59

    Field renaming is essential to powering your Ecosystem of Good vision. Organizations working within your ecosystem each have their own unique mission, culture, and language. Without the ability to rename fields, staff are forced to constantly translate between database labels and how they actually talk about their work—creating friction and disconnection from the platform.

    For example: Our "Religion" field is actually used to track the constituent's active parish—religion isn't relevant to our mission. By renaming this field to "Active Parish," our staff feels like the system speaks our language and reflects our values. This alignment matters for adoption, efficiency, and a sense of shared purpose.

    When each organization in your ecosystem can authentically express itself within RE NXT, you accomplish more together than apart. Field renaming is a small feature that has outsized impact on how well an organization can truly own their data and their story.

  • Deb Dressely commented
    May 23, 2025 14:55

    Linked ideas: Updated 5/23/2025

    RENXT-I-222: 94 votes

    RE7-I-1814: 44 votes

    RENXT-I-2523: 25 votes

    RENXT-I-2548: 30 votes

  • Maya Rosman commented
    February 26, 2024 19:33

    Please do this. We depend on some of the ways we rename fields to make processes clearer for our staff. And, as things move forward, we need the ability to manage how fields display and change field names in webview (assuming all functionality will eventually move from database view to webview) and have the renamed fields show up with the renamed values in system tools like query and export as well.

  • Rachel Newbury commented
    November 04, 2021 11:47

    Please link these 4 ideas as they are essentially asking for the same thing and together they have 85 votes.
    RENXT-I-222: 48 votes
    RENXT-I-1814: 21 votes
    RENXT-I-2523: 9 votes
    RENXT-I-2548: 7 votes

    Thank you.

  • Martin Knowles commented
    October 20, 2021 11:02

    Please link this idea to the similar/same ideas of

  • Rachel Bock commented
    July 15, 2021 14:18

    It's been 6 years since this was posted - any updates? This is problematic.

  • Julie Hiland commented
    May 14, 2019 18:03

    I wondered why some of our Opportunities fields were not being filled in by our gift officers. Come to discover, what they see as "Likelihood" in NXT, is really our repurposed "Service Line" field!  Please bring these "Display As"/"Repurposed" changes from RE into NXT!

  • Guest commented
    June 20, 2017 21:01

    I would also like to see the above implemented.