Use Custom Fields in NXT Columns and Filters

We sort our constituents into 32 different flavors by attributes.  Each attribute identifies which of our many communities relates to each constituent.   Being able to see attributes in an NXT column, or filter by attributes would be a huge advance in our Raiser's Edge capacity.

  • Guest
  • Apr 26 2016
  • Shipped
  • Sep 6, 2016

    Admin response

    We recently shipped the ability to include Custom fields in columns and filters for NXT constituent lists.

  • Attach files
  • Guest commented
    September 06, 2016 20:44

    It would be helpful to be able to filter action lists by constituent attributes (or custom fields), too! We use attributes to identify target cities and it would be really helpful for Development Officers to be able to view lists of open actions by target city.

  • Guest commented
    July 12, 2016 16:12

    This is very similar to another idea I posted called "More Filtering Capabilities." Filtering by attribute/custom field is a huge need for so many of us!

  • Blake Moody commented
    July 07, 2016 19:39

    We have an attribute called "Center" for our funds that holds our branch (aka center). So regardless of the fund category, or type, or year we can filter funds by the related center.

  • Susanne Larsen commented
    April 27, 2016 18:26

    Yes, us too.  For example, in Actions, we capture whether or not a prospect was qualified successfully (or not) via an Action attribute, therefore we can't yet report on, or look at, successful qualifications as a subset of Qualification action types in NXT. Thanks!

  • Guest commented
    April 27, 2016 15:54

    I agree, this would be a great addition to NXT.

  • Guest commented
    April 27, 2016 12:15

    We sort our constituents into 32 different flavors by attributes.  Each attribute identifies which of our many communities relates to each constituent.   Being able to see attributes in an NXT column, or filter by attributes would be a huge advance in our Raiser's Edge capacity.

    I second these comments!