Show relationships on non constituent records


  • Danyelle Hoover
  • Nov 4 2021
  • Reviewed: Voting Open
  • Attach files
  • Emily Marshall commented
    22 Sep 19:44

    Adding a tile within a relationship record that displays the connected Constituents would significantly improve navigation and usability. Currently, users must rely on the browser’s ‘back’ button to return to the associated Constituent’s record, which is inefficient and prone to error. A dedicated tile would provide immediate context, streamline workflow, and reduce friction when managing relationship data - especially in environments where users frequently toggle between records. This enhancement supports better data visibility and fosters a more intuitive user experience.

  • Jennie Henderson commented
    12 Sep 02:05

    I agree! It is a waste of time to have to run a query to find the constituent that has a relationship with the non-constituent record. Please make this information flow into NXT.

  • Katy Roberts commented
    26 Aug 02:05

    See also idea 5013. Please make this happen. BILL CONNORS AGREES-

  • Steven Lopresti commented
    07 Aug 18:21

    Ridiculous that you can't see who the relationship has a relationship to. It's basically an orphaned relationship, when viewed from the relationship record (unless you're a spouse or full constituent).

  • Guest commented
    September 12, 2022 17:31

    Yes! Sometimes I need to know who is linked to a relationship record and I have to go into the database view to run a query which takes 10 min. This is information that should be displayed on the relationship record (AT LEAST for primary contacts).

  • Bill Connors commented
    July 29, 2022 19:24

    I guess this is the "idea" to address that information that is clearly capable int he db view just doesn't show up in the web view: non-constituent relationships in the db view can have Business and Education records. If that data is in the database view, it should appear in the web view. Plain and simple, this needs to be added.

  • Katy Roberts commented
    November 06, 2021 00:56

    This is an excellent suggestion Danyelle - this seems to be an essential bit of data that is missing.

  • Danyelle Hoover commented
    November 04, 2021 16:51

    It would be very helpful if relationships were visible on non constituent records so as to see the reciprocal constituent record.


    For instance, I have and XYZ Foundation as a non-constituent record, therefore it has a constituent reciprocal relationship, however I can't see that from the non-constituent record for XYZ Foundation.